EDER 677 – L01
Telecommunications in Education
A
PROJECT PROPOSAL
By Arlene Kent – Wilkinson & Lana Hanson
Submitted to Norm Vaughan
| Project
Title
Collaboration in the development
of Multimedia Interactivities
|
| Project Specifications |
| U of C Course Calendar
- Summer Session 2002
U of C Course Calendar - Summer Session
2002
|
![]() |
|
Project
Developers
![]() |
|
|
Course Coordinator, Content Expert and Instructor |
|
|
|
|
Project
Background
| Spring Session 1995-2002
U of C Spring Course: Nurs 503.08
Delivery: Classroom
Institution: University of Calgary
|
![]() |
| Reasons for Forensic
Online Courses
Media exposure has brought a recent fascination and heightened interest into the understanding of the mind of infamous perpetrators and the social/legal issues of how to deal with offenders and care for their victims are forefront! Due to the recent interest in the study of forensic health practices there is increasing demand for forensic courses internationally. A challenge in educational technology is the dissemination of our forensic body of knowledge internationally. The value of accessing and utilizing forensic people and resources internationally on the Web is just beginning to be realized for future collaborations, with a greater degree of international links promised (Kent-Wilkinson et al, 1999). |
| Project Timelines |
Graph Timeline - Forensic Collaborative
Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Background |
|
. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Proposal for Curriculum | . |
|
. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Approval | . | . |
|
. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Funding | . | . |
|
. | . | . | . |
|
. | . | . | . |
| Content Writing | . | . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. | . |
| Marketing | . | . | . | . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
| WebCT Development | . | . | . | . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
| Team Collaboration | . | . | . | . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
| Interactivity Development | . | . | . | . | . |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
| Project Proposal for EDER 677 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
. | . | . | . |
|
| Project Evaluation EDER 677 | .. | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
. | .. | . |
|
| Online Classroom | . | .. | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
|
. |
|
| Online Net | .. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
|
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
| Student Evaluation | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
|
. |
|
| Project Tools |
| WebCT:
The worlds most popular course management system. WebCT supports excellence in online teaching and learning with course tool software, resources and academic expertise. |
|
| Dreamweaver:
The Web page editor of Dreamweaver will be used to upload course content |
| Intended
Audience
(Cap: 20 students)
|
| Project Collaboration TEAM |
| Arlene Kent-Wilkinson RN, MN
Student - EDER 677 University of Calgary - Graduate Division of Educational Research Project: Course Developer/Writer/ Instructor University of Calgary -
University of Calgary -
o Dr Carol Lynne LeNavenec – Nursing Support
|
Ms. Lana Hanson -
Student - EDER 677 University of Calgary - Graduate Division of Educational Research Project: Interactivity Technology University of Calgary -
University of Calgary -
Web Designer
SAIT Practicum
|
| Project
Purpose
“ A decision making aid … Intended to guide selection of instructional media according to their instructional and cost effectiveness” (Rothwell & Kazanas, 1998) “Any technology can disseminate information; the instructor must create interactive opportunities and assess whether students have the basic knowledge to move forward to the next level of learning” (Don Olcott, 1999) This Forensic Course through the World Wide Web offers students both flexibility and accessibility. Students access content when convenient for them. Because students study at their own pace, they determine a study schedule that makes room for life's other commitments. Study through the WWW is a very attractive alternative for pursuing academic goals. This Forensic Course would introduce many new roles such as Forensic Clinical Nurse Specialists, Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners, Forensic Legal Consultants, Forensic Geriatric and Pediatric Nurse Specialists. It also informs the student of forensic roles in existence that present curriculums may not have addressed i.e. correctional and forensic psychiatric nursing, forensic psychology, forensic social work etc. This Forensic Course would provide insight as to current and future career opportunities within the forensic arena. Forensic areas are anywhere health care professionals deal with victims or perpetrators of catastrophic accidents, physical or emotional trauma, violence and crime. The Forensic Internet Course will address a new area of multidisciplinary interest emerging internationally - where health care and the law interface. Unique elements of this proposed course are:
|
| Course
Objectives
The major objectives of this course are to acquaint students and health care professionals with an overview of health care in forensic practice arenas. The historical development of the forensic sciences and the prevailing social/ethical forensic issues where health care interfaces with the law will be addressed. Practice roles of forensic subspecialties will be outlined, together with the target forensic populations they serve. After completing this course students should be able to: 1. Explore the historical events, laws and acts that have influenced the evolution of forensic health care practices within the health and justice systems. 2. Describe the roles and responsibilities of specific forensic subspecialties with regard to intervening with populations of victims and/or perpetrators. 3. Relate common forensic concepts to specific forensic populations at risk. 4. Examine prevailing social/ethical issues where health care and the law overlap. 5. Access and utilize Internet based tools to explore and network with forensic experts and resources internationally. |
| Learning
Goals of Forensic Course Online
Collaboration is a philosophy of interaction and personal lifestyle where individuals are responsible for their actions, including learning and respect the abilities and contributions of their peers. (Panitz, 2000) Cooperation is a structure of interaction designed to facilitate the accomplishment of a specific end product or goal through people working together in groups. (Panitz, 2000) The underlying premise
for both collaborative and cooperative learning is founded in constructivist
theory. Knowledge is discovered by students and transformed into concepts
students can relate to. It is then reconstructed and expanded through new
learning experiences. Learning consists of active participation by the
student versus passive acceptance of information presented by an expert
lecturer. Learning comes about through transactions and dialogue among
students and between faculty and students, in a social setting. Students
learn to understand and appreciate different perspectives through a dialogue
with their peers. A dialogue with the teacher helps students learn the
vocabulary and social structures which govern the groups students wish
to join, such as historian, mathematician, writer, actor, etc. (Panitz,
2000).
After years of depending on the instructor in the classroom, learners are experiencing a change. Clearly online, the responsibility to learn shifts considerably to the learner. Since instructors, who previously addressed the cognitive, affective and social factors in the classroom are not always available, the primary cognitive-based solutions and perspectives used previously may be incomplete and need to be refined. The area of consideration is how to design and present instruction that recognized, matches, and supports how individuals want and intend to learn differently (more than just how learners build knowledge). In this area, the primary learning goals of this project should provide multimedia interactivities that: 1. To accomplish instructional objectives 2. To cooperate and collaborate on activities 3. To continually improve online learning ability (e. g., more self-motivated and self-directed learning when they were in instructor-led environments) 4. To build learning environment that adapt to individual learning differences As we put learners
online and expect learners to take on more responsibility for their learning,
we begin to see learners as individuals and identify how each may use or
need additional support to improve their online learning achievement and
ability over time. In this understanding, we also begin to see patterns
(from a “whole-person” perspective) that identify gaps in how people are
equipped to engage in learning online.
|
| Related
Research and Resources
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive process (Revised April 19).http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/cmc/CogPresPaper_June30_.pdf Harasim, L. (1994). Shaping cyberspace into human space. (1994, Sept.). Update Newsletter, (6)3. Published by The Centre for Systems Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada, V5A 1S6, ph: 604-291-3455 Editor: Barry Shell shell@cs.sfu.ca http://css.sfu.ca/update/vol6/6.3-harasim.main.html Harvey, P. (1998). Mount Royal College, Forensic education research online-study 2A URL: http://www.mtroyal.ab.ca/olt/ Hawley, P.& Desborough, K. (1998). The computer as tutor. The Canadian Nurse, 94(4), 31-35. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (2002, Jan). Beyond classroom solutions: New design perspectives for online learning excellence, moderated by Maggie Martinez, CEO, The training place, USA, http://ifets.ieee.org/discussions/discuss_january2002.html Kent-Wilkinson, A., Mckeown, M., Mercer, D., McCann, G. & Mason, T. (1999). Practitioner training, future directions, and challenges for Practice. in Mercer, D., Mason, T., Mckeown, M. & McCann, G. [Eds] (1999). Forensic mental health care: A case study approach. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. ISBN 0-443-06140-8. Klatt, B. (1999). Adult-learning principles [Chapter Two, pp. 66-72]. The ultimate training workshop handbook. McCraw –Hill: Philadelphia, PA. Lewis, M. & Kraas, M. (1998). Challenges of teaching graduate psychiatric mental health nursing with distance education technologies. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 12, 227-233. Nielsen, J. Schemenaur, P.J & Fox, J. Writing for the web. Sun Microsystems, retrieved Jan 25, 2002 from http://www.sun.com/980713/webwriting/ Nilson, C. (1991). How to train groups of employees. [Chapter 4, pp.90-117]. Training for non-trainers: Do it yourself guide for managers. Library of Congress: (AMA) American Management Association. Palloff, R. M. & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom: The Realities of Online Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company. Paulsen, M. F. (1993). The hexagon of
cooperative freedom: A distance education theory attuned to computer
conferencing. DEOSNEWS(3), 2. ISSN 1062-9416. The Distance Education
Online Symposium, Norway, retrieved Feb 01, 2002 from
Popkewitz, T.S. & Brennan, M. (Editors)(1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge and power in education. New York & London: Teacher College, Columbia University. Panitz, T. (2000). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Coop/Collab Definitions, retrieved Jan 21, 2002 from http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.htm Rothwell, W. J, & Kazanas H. C. (1998). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schutte, J. (1998). Virtua teaching in Higher Education: The new intellectual superhighway or just another traffic jam? Retrieved Jan 21, 2002 from http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital:
The rise of the net generation. New York McGraw Hill Companies Inc.
|
| BACK TO TOP |